October 27, 2004
#6 – The Final Countdown: Ignorance & Oafishness

From perhaps the most goof-prone president in history, a rundown of embarrassing and just plain stupid moments.

September 2003: Bush breaks U.S. Code Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 8 (g) by signing an American flag, then supports an unnecessary and pandering constitutional amendment "to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States."

October 2003: Paul Krugman identifies the President’s “willful ignorance.”

According to The New York Times, President Bush was genuinely surprised to learn from moderate Islamic leaders that they had become deeply distrustful of American intentions. The report on the "perception gap" suggests that the leader of the war on terror has no idea how badly that war — which must, ultimately, be a war for hearts and minds — is going.

Mr. Bush's ignorance may reflect his lack of curiosity: "The best way to get the news," he says, "is from objective sources. And the most objective sources I have are people on my staff." Two words: emperor, clothes.

But there's something broader going on: a sort of willful ignorance, supposedly driven by moral concerns but actually reflecting domestic politics. Surely it's important to understand how others see us, but a new, post 9/11 version of political correctness has made it difficult even to discuss their points of view. Any American who tries to go beyond "America good, terrorists evil," who tries to understand — not condone — the growing world backlash against the United States, faces furious attacks delivered in a tone of high moral indignation.

January 2004: In visits to New Orleans and Atlanta, Bush portrays himself as an heir to the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr., saying that he shared with the slain civil rights leader a belief in the transforming power of faith in American life. Um, G.W.? You ain't no MLKJ. He stood up for the poor and oppressed. You, well, let's just say you do not.

January 2004: Bush’s State of the Union speech rings hollow with the New York Times:

President Bill Clinton always pleased the public when he stuffed his State of the Union address with lots and lots of proposals, many small and symbolic. Mr. Bush, who devoted an entire paragraph to decrying the use of steroids in sports, stands second to nobody when it comes to tiny symbolic gestures. Many of his larger thoughts, meanwhile, were vague to the point of meaninglessness.

February 2004: In the wake of violence in Iraq, Bush tells Tim Russert that the American forces have been “welcomed” in Iraq:

”Well, I think we are welcomed in Iraq. I'm not exactly sure, given the tone of your questions, we're not. We are welcomed in Iraq.”

March 2004: Bush stages a mock hunt for WMDs for the Radio-Television Correspondents Dinner, looking under his bed and in the closets of his residence quarters at the White House.

April 2004: Bush lives the unexamined life. Oh, and he doesn’t make mistakes, either.

President Bush was asked, during a very brief session with reporters yesterday, about the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo he received on domestic terrorism. He responded with the familiar White House complaint about lack of specificity in the C.I.A.'s warnings — although the memo mentioned a plot, possibly involving hijacked planes and New York City. The most striking thing about the president's comment, however, was his bottom line: that he did everything he could. Over the last few weeks we have heard lawmakers and officials from two administrations talk about their feelings of responsibility, about how they compulsively re-examine the events leading up to 9/ll, asking themselves whether they could have done anything to avert the terrible disaster that day. It is beginning to seem that the only person free of that kind of self-examination is the man who was chief executive when the attacks occurred.

July 2004: Bush launched an attack against Fidel Castro and his alleged promotion of sex tourism in Cuba:

"The dictator welcomes sex tourism," Bush told a room of law enforcement officials in Florida, according to the Los Angeles Times. "Here's how he bragged about the industry," Bush said. "This is his quote: 'Cuba has the cleanest and most educated prostitutes in the world.'"

As it turns out, Bush had lifted that quotation not from an actual Castro speech but rather from a 2001 essay written by then Dartmouth University undergraduate Charles Trumbull. In the essay, Trumbull did appear to quote a Castro speech about prostitution. Sadly, the student made the quotation up.

September 2004: President Bush repeatedly confused terrorist Abu Nidal and Abul Abbas in at least campaign speeches.

October 2004: Bush spectacularly blows his first debate, adding impatience, scowls and smirks to his usual overblown and unintelligent rhetoric.

Comments