From yesterday's AP wire via Yahoo! News, "Bush Campaigns Heavily on Air Force One":
President Bush is using Air Force One for re-election travel more heavily than any predecessor, wringing maximum political mileage from a perk of office paid for by taxpayers.While Democratic rival John Kerry digs into his campaign bank account to charter a plane to roam the country, Bush often travels at no cost to his campaign simply by declaring a trip "official" travel rather than "political."
Even when the White House deems a trip as political, the cost to Bush's campaign is minimal. In such instances, the campaign must only pay the government the equivalent of a comparable first-class fare for each political traveler on each leg, Federal Election Commission guidelines say.
Usually, that means paying a few hundred or a few thousand dollars for the president and a handful of aides. It's a minuscule sum, compared to the $56,800-per-hour the Air Force estimates it costs to run Air Force One.
It is an advantage that Bush and other presidents before him have enjoyed. President Clinton frequently was criticized by Republicans for his record-setting use of Air Force One in the campaign season, and Bush is exceeding Clinton's pace.
"It's really something that's abused," said Bill Allison, managing editor of the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit, government watchdog group.
"On the one hand, the president can't fly coach," Allison said. "But on the other hand, taxpayers are in essence subsidizing campaign trips, something that goes against the grain of how the political system is supposed to operate."
[. . .]
Bush has logged more than 68,000 miles this year on Air Force One, all within the continental United States except for a quick run to Mexico in January. With rare exceptions, he confines his travels to the more than a dozen states he and Kerry are fighting hardest for, and to places where he is raising campaign money.
Of those states, Bush has made five trips to Pennsylvania, four each to Missouri, Florida and Ohio, and three to Wisconsin. He also has flown to 24 fund-raisers for himself and the Republican Party.
The White House labeled travel to fund-raisers "political." Likewise, it deemed as "political" a thank-you mixer with big donors in Georgia, his first campaign rally in Orlando, Fla., and bus tours through Michigan, Ohio, Iowa and Wisconsin, meaning his campaign paid a share of the costs.
But of the more than $203 million Bush has raised for his re-election, less than 1 percent has gone to reimbursing the government for travel costs this year.
[. . .]
It is difficult to say precisely what the Bush campaign is repaying the government per trip. The White House refuses to:
- Provide lists of political aides who travel with Bush and whose travels are financed by the re-election campaign; or say how many political aides go on any given trip, or even offer a range.
- Provide dollar figures on reimbursements for specific trips. Bush's re-election campaign periodically reports to the FEC lump reimbursement sums for unspecified travel.
- Say how it decides which trips are official rather than political.
An Associated Press tally of Bush's travels shows he has made at least 114 trips in the 17 months since January 2003.
Clinton flew Air Force One on 123 domestic trips between January 1995 and mid-October 1996, a period of 22 months. It was a record for re-election-related travel aboard the presidential aircraft, according to the Center for Public Integrity.
Anyone care to add in all those trips to Crawford our habitually vacationing President has taken?
I can understand this is a good reason to dump Bush. No other president has ever used Air Force One for transportation. I suppose he should fly commercial with Ackmed the shoe bomber.
Poor Kerry with his hundred of millions of dollars of wealth having to put gas in his 35 million dollar private jet. Maybe he can deduct the gas he uses in his $800,000 speed boat on his tax return. Wait, Kerry doesnt pay taxes because we all know the rich dont pay taxes.
Now we know why he feels the common persons pain. Buying gas for the private jet has caused him to cut back on real estae purchases- oh, wait his contributors are paying for all of this. These poor contributors, hope they can still eat.
1) Of course the president isn't going to take commercial flights (although those of who do would appreciate it if money was actually being spent to prevent terrorism at home rather being diverted into Iraq on a wild goose chase for WMD) - the issue here is disclosure and compensation.
2) I'm not wild about the fact that this election comes down to a contest between two guys with similar stock portfolios, but since it does I'm going to pick the one who hasn't been telling such costly lies.
Posted by: Jane on June 2, 2004 01:30 AMI'm Right, you are very very wrong. Kerry doesn't have hundreds of millions of dollars. The Heinz fortune is not his and he has no access to it. The rest of what you had to say is just unintelligable dribble. At least you are reading sites like this so maybe you are trying to learn something. Vote Kerry in November. The world will be much better off for it.
Posted by: Bob on June 2, 2004 11:05 AMHow come nobody cared when Al Gore hopped all over the country on Air Force Two in 2000, paid for by the taxpayers.
Posted by: AJ on October 20, 2004 08:12 AM










