March 26, 2004
#221 - His Tasteless Humor

From yesterday's Defense Department Operational Briefing, via Wonkette:

Q: I wanted to go back for a minute, if I might -- for both of you -- to the question of the seriousness of Iraq. And I want to stipulate two things. We understand and we know at neither of you gentlemen were at the Radio-Television Correspondents dinner last night here in Washington where the president spoke. I also want to say that I am specifically asking you this question -- it's difficult to ask, but with all respect to the Office of the President.

And I brought the transcript with me. And it goes to the point of whether Iraq is really a serious matter or not. The president made some remarks in a humorous fashion, and he showed some pictures there which most of us there saw. And he made some jokes about the hunt for the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. And he said, quoting from the transcript, showing a picture, "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere." And then there was, in fact, laughter and applause from the audience. And then he showed another picture: "No, no weapons over there." Laughter and applause. Another picture: "Maybe under here." Laughter.

So my question, really, truly in all seriousness, is -- both for the president, with respect, and for the news media -- is it appropriate to make a joke -- seriously, sirs -- about the hunt for weapons of mass destruction, when both of you, of course, were involved in the difficult issue of sending troops to war for that hunt? And did the news media also blow it by sitting there and laughing? Did we blow it last night?

SEC. RUMSFELD: I wasn't there, and I --

Q: I understand. (And that is why ?) I'm reading the transcript very accurately to you.

SEC. RUMSFELD: I think you have to -- to know what I would think, I would have had to be there. I think the context of those evenings -- I wasn't there, as you said, but I think I've attended in previous years on occasion, and I just am not in a position to be judgmental about that.

Well. It's a very good thing the Secretary isn't judgmental, because if he were he might wonder about the extreme inappropriateness of the President making light of his inability to find weapons of mass destruction, the hunt for which was directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American and coalition soldiers and thousands of Iraqis.

But then we guess that wouldn't be funny after all.

Comments

Yep, you know what would be frickin hillarious is if Rummy or Bush had colon polyp surgery, and then the Dr told em, "well, I thought they were in there, they have to be somewhere, right?"

Posted by: Dave on March 26, 2004 11:43 AM

LIBERALS SUCK COCK

Posted by: steven on March 27, 2004 06:59 AM

Well Steve, I disagree with you, but I and the ACLU will defend your right to say it anyway. Thanks for keeping it on the high road.

Posted by: Dave on March 27, 2004 09:10 AM

I think Steve is jealous. As for Bush, I'm not surprised. And, where is the toady news media?

Posted by: Frank on March 27, 2004 03:55 PM

This is more insidious than you might at first think.

Yes, it is awful of the Bush administration to make light of their failure to find WMD. But what's worse is that this new tack BC2004 seem to be taking to "soften" their attacks with humor. People (and by that, I mean the vast majority of voters, but not all by any means) are fickle, and they may well remember, come November, that "those Bush ads were pretty funny, weren't they?" and vote incorrectly because of it.

If John Kerry can't make it known that he's not an intellectual stuffed shirt, the people are going to vote for another four years of George W. Bush and his amusing dog and pony show.

Posted by: Jas on March 31, 2004 12:39 PM

Damn, if you're right Jas, and the majority of our fellow Americans are that stupid, we probably deserve four more years of Mr. Comemdy.

Posted by: Dave on April 2, 2004 10:38 AM

i think that "dave" is one of the most ignorant people that have ever posted a comment online. it makes him sound very intelligent and apparently he has a good argument for why he is opposed to liberals. if only he had the intellectual capacity to express it in an intellgent and respectful manner. as a liberal and intellegent woman, i feel the bush administration has done nothing but mislead the people of america with the falsified documents. SLowly but surely bush is trying to defy the laws of separation between church and state. all of his laws are based on religious text and there is a reason for the separation. not everyone in this country is christian and apparently bush did not get that memo

Posted by: jordan on November 2, 2004 01:30 PM

i correct myself dave is not the ignorant one it is steven.

Posted by: jordan on November 2, 2004 01:31 PM