March 12, 2004
#235 - Reclassification, Not Recovery

From the New York Times via the Indianapolis Star:

Is cooking a hamburger patty and inserting the meat and trimmings inside a bun a manufacturing job, like assembling cars? That question is posed in the new Economic Report of the President, a thick annual compendium of observations and statistics on the health of the U.S. economy. The latest edition questions whether fast-food restaurants should continue to be counted as part of the service sector or be reclassified as manufacturers. No answers were offered.

Counting jobs at McDonald's and Burger King alongside those at General Motors and Eastman Kodak might seem like a stretch.

But the presidential report points out that the current system for classifying jobs "is not straightforward." The White House found this section of the report important enough to highlight it.

"When a fast-food restaurant sells a hamburger, for example, is it providing a 'service' or is it combining inputs to 'manufacture' a product?" the report asks.

The report notes that the Census Bureau industry classification system defines manufacturing as covering enterprises "engaged in the mechanical, physical or chemical transformation of materials, substances or components into new products."

David Huether of the National Association of Manufacturers, said he had heard that some economists wanted to count hamburger flipping as manufacturing, which he noted would result in statistical reports showing many more jobs in a declining sector.

"The question is: If you heat the hamburger up are you chemically transforming it?" Huether said. His answer? No.

Comments

Under this criteria, shouldn't the office of the presidency be reclassified as a manufacturing position? By assembling one part BS, with 2 parts hegemony, and add 3 parts cronyism, they have 'manufactured' this mess we are in.

Posted by: bill on March 12, 2004 08:18 AM

I would have to agree with "bill" on this one.

Posted by: Zog on March 13, 2004 10:57 AM

I was wondering if rumors re: Bohemian Grove activities/membership have much substance.
The rumors are at times quite extraordinary to say the least. This is just a suggestion. Maybe you know someone more expert about that stuff.
I am registered Republican (but rarely vote GOP--pls dont tell 'em) and in many ways conservative but more of a "Clintonian." In other words, I am sympathetic to "almost anyone but GW."


Another angle---Back in January of 2003 the NY Times ran a three-day series on an Birmingham, Alabama-based steel maker and its horrendous industrial safety record. I lost the article.
(and forget the titles and names)(early,mid Januar) It might be a way to show that George II's administration is, in still another way, not worth the money. This was, it seemed to me, a disgraceful scandal, one of the smelliest but it seems no one caught the scent.
Thanks for your efforts.

JF

Posted by: JF on April 6, 2004 01:12 AM