February 12, 2004
#264 – Ashcroft’s Justice Department Can’t Remember What Decade it is

Americans’ civil liberties continue to be attacked by an overzealous Justice Department – even in the red states:

To hear the antiwar protesters describe it, their forum at a local university last fall was like so many others they had held over the years. They talked about the nonviolent philosophies of Mahatma Gandhi and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., they said, and how best to convey their feelings about Iraq into acts of civil disobedience.

But last week, subpoenas began arriving seeking details about the forum's sponsor — its leadership list, its annual reports, its office location — and the event itself.

[…]

Late on Monday, prosecutors in the United States attorney's office for the southern district of Iowa took the unusual step of issuing a confirmation of the investigation, stressing that its scope was limited to learning more about one person who had tried to scale a security fence at an Iowa National Guard base in a protest a day after the forum.

"The United States attorney's office does not prosecute persons peacefully and lawfully engaged in rallies which are conducted under the protection of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States," a written statement issued by the prosecutor here, Stephen Patrick O'Meara, said.

[...]

"I've heard of such a thing, but not since the 1950's, the McCarthy era," said David D. Cole, a Georgetown law professor. "It sends a very troubling message about government officials' attitudes toward basic liberties." (“An Antiwar Forum in Iowa Brings Federal Subpoenas,” the New York Times)


On Tuesday, Justice realized its mistake:

Facing growing public pressure from civil liberties advocates, federal prosecutors on Tuesday dropped subpoenas that they issued last week ordering antiwar protesters to appear before a grand jury and ordering a university to turn over information about the protesters.

The protesters, who had said they feared that the unusual federal inquiry was intended to silence and scare people who disagreed with government positions, declared victory. (“Subpoenas on Antiwar Protest Are Dropped,” the New York Times)


We need a President who will stand up and say, ‘Enough is enough.’

We need a President who would not nominate an Attorney General like John Ashcroft in the first place.

Comments

I will take this man who has had to do the clean up for the past any day of the week.

Posted by: WEZ on February 14, 2004 06:56 PM

Yep, thats right kids! Having an opinion is a criminal offense! You don't agree with what the government is doing?? TERRORIST! TERRORIST!!

Thats it, this place sucks. I'm moving to Cananda!

Posted by: Seren on February 15, 2004 06:52 PM

Boy, that's a weak reason. What do I have to do hold your hand and teach you how to gather facts? Find something you convince people with. This tripe only gives the G.W. of the world ammunition to say we're losers. You write as if no one but us can make a mistake. Get something with meat on it!

Posted by: Tom on February 21, 2004 02:04 PM

Hooray for 525 reasons!

Posted by: Johnny Friendly on June 23, 2004 10:56 AM