The Bush administration has refused to send to the U.S. Senate for ratification the treaty that created the International Criminal Court – a body which uses international law to try individuals charged with genocide, war crimes, and other widespread crimes against civilians.
President Clinton signed the treaty in his final month in office, but it must be ratified before the United States is considered a signatory. The treaty has been signed by 137 countries and ratified by 90, enough to allow the Court to come into existence in July 2002 at the Hague. Other non-signatories include China, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Iraq and Turkey.
The Bush administration fears that the Court could someday indict American soldiers for human rights abuses, and has all but forced 37 developing countries to sign agreements prohibiting American citizens from being tried before the Court.
This represents an extreme dereliction of duty by the world’s only superpower, the ultimate in international arrogance. The Bush administration would rather have the perpetuators of war crimes go free than face the possibility that American soldiers who commit abuses could be indicted by the international community.
No doubt Bush believes that American soldiers would not commit human rights violations. But there are some survivors in a village called My Lai who would beg to differ. Perhaps if the American soldiers who slaughtered civilians in My Lai had known they could be indicted for their actions, they might not have shot so indiscriminately. And if policy-makers could have been indicted, they may not have left such unfit soldiers in the field.
Thanks to Bush, we won't have the possibility of indictment as deterrent in the future. So much for world leadership.
It's not that the war criminals would go free, it's that the administration KNOWS that WE would be the people going to get them, so what's the point?
Posted by: mrjerz on June 13, 2003 01:47 PMIf I'm not mistaken, many of the Serbian war criminals now on trial were turned over by their fellow countrymen. And the Kosovo War which led to their removal from power was a UN-initiated affair. How is that "US" going to get them?
Additionally, the point is that there is an actual COURT for the world to try such criminals in. This is opposed to the current US policy of "going to get" our "criminals", and then dragging them back to quasi-US territory and trying them in dubious, secrecy-shrouded "military tribunals". Yep, having an actual COURT to do that is a BAD idea. No point to it at all.
Posted by: Sam on July 23, 2003 07:18 AM










